New China, US Dispute Mediation Center Created
Center will fill the need for ''alternative'' business conflict resolution
BEIJING, China - 02/03/04 - A new US-China Business Mediation Center has been created to give both US and Chinese companies leery of the unpredictability of China's judicial system and the costs of binding arbitration a new option in business dispute resolution.
The Center is a joint venture of the New York-based CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution and the official China Council for Promotion of International Trade.
The new Center - which will have offices on both New York and Beijing - will offer US and Chinese companies a relatively speedier and more inexpensive alternative to both the domestic court system and binding arbitration to resolve business disputes, said Thomas Stipanowich, president of the CPR Institute in New York.?
"Mediation can afford parties the opportunity to avoid extensive involvement with the court system," Stipanowich told the Dow Jones Newswire.
"Relatively speaking, mediation is not an expensive process, much less expensive than going to court and having a trial or arbitrating [because] often mediation can achieve its goals within a day or two or even a few hours."
The CPR Institute is a nonprofit alliance including law firms, public institutions and corporations including General Motors Corp., pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc., and the Intel Corp.
CCPIT's initiative last year to form the mediation center underlines China's intent to smooth the edges of a key trade relationship rocked by repeated US criticism of the country's foreign exchange regime and intellectual property right protection efforts. The US is China's second largest trading partner after Japan.
The yuan is only convertible on the trade account. Even then is kept in a tight band around 8.227 to the US dollar, giving China what critics say is an unfair export advantage because the yuan's value has fallen in tandem with the dollar's over the past year.
Stipanowich said the need for alternative methods of business dispute resolution between US and Chinese companies has been heightened by "an all-time high" China-US trade volume of $126.3 billion in 2003.
That figure compares with China's total trade volume of $851 billion in 2003, powered by 35% year-on-year rise in exports to $438 billion and a 40% on-year increase in imports to $413 billion in the same period.
"Whenever you have cross border transactions, there are always [disputes]...including different cultural expectations, political issues and just basic communication problems that may not emerge within a purely domestic business transaction," Stipanowich said.
CPR Institute and CCPIT will select and train a total of 48 individuals by the end of 2004 to serve as the center's first cadre of professional mediators.
"Our goal is to select people who will help to credential the program [such as] distinguished practitioners of the law or leaders in the business community with skill as mediators," Stipanowich said.
Those mediators will be tasked to resolve possibly hundreds of annual business disputes between US and Chinese companies ranging from contract interpretation and quality of performance to IPR issues.
Stipanowich said the success of the new mediation Center will hinge on educating companies that might have need of its services as well as Chinese judges that have the power to refer legal disputes to mediation.
The flexibility and relative informality that the new center offers will be a welcome alternative to traditional legal recourse, Stipanowich said.
"An informal process like [mediation] can mold itself to the needs of its participants," he said.
"It's a consensual process that puts the [disputing] parties in the driver seat...ultimately its up to [them] to decide when and how [they'll] solve it."
back, or read the latest Front Page stories:
EU Threatens to Re-Impose Punitive Import Tariffs
WASHINGTON, DC – 02/15/06 – The US is urging the European Union to not re-impose punitive tariffs on selected US exports following a World Trade Organization ruling that the 2004 US law repealing illegal export tax breaks is ''inadequate;'' at issue are the Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC) mechanism and the successor Extraterritorial Income Act (ETI), which allowed certain US exporters to exclude some of their trade-related profits from taxation.
Cuts in Farm Subsidies Sought
WASHINGTON, DC – 02/13/06 – The Bush Administration is proposing a 5% reduction in commodity subsidies paid out to US farmers during the next fiscal year; the proposal was put forward as part of President Bush’s recent budget request along with a separate plan to lower the cap on the amount a farmer could receive in a year from price- and income-support payments to $250,000 a year, down from the current annual cap of $360,000.
US-Led Bio Food Challenge Upheld
WASHINGTON, DC – 02/10/06 – A challenge to the European Union’s moratorium on approvals of genetically-modified food products and agricultural crops by the US, Canada, and Argentina has been upheld by the World Trade Organization (WTO); the three governments had charged that the ban was not based on scientific evidence and maintained that biotech crops are as safe to health and the environment as other crops produced through more conventional methods.