/javascript" src="../static/js/analytics.js"> CalTrade Report - We've Got Good News and Bad News Public Policy Instotute of California, California, CalTrade Report - We've Got Good News and Bad News - New study asks if California'../">CalTrade Report Asia Quake Victims 04/20/04 - Two-way trade flowing through the state is expected to triple in volume by the year 2020 with the dollar value of exports shipped through California increasing by 148% and the value of imports increasing by 81%; but, a new report by the Public Policy Institute of California says the state's transportation and trade-support infrastructure including airports and deep-water ports is not up to the task and needs to be managed more efficiently. - 04/20/04 - Two-way trade flowing through the state is expected to triple in volume by the year 2020 with the dollar value of exports shipped through California increasing by 148% and the value of imports increasing by 81%; but, a new report by the Public Policy Institute of California says the state's transportation and trade-support infrastructure including airports and deep-water ports is not up to the task and needs to be managed more efficiently. - We've Got Good News and Bad News Public Policy Instotute of California, California, CalTrade Report - We'../i/shim.gif

 

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

 

Become a CalTrade Member--It's Free!
Front Page
Page Two
PR Newswire
Opinion
Profiles
Trade Leads
Calendar
Mission
Editor
Press Releases
Partner Orgs
Advertise Opp.
Contact Us
Int.Time Clock
Currency Calc
Cal Links
Free Services


Our Car

Front Page

E-mail PagePrint Version



We've Got Good News and Bad News

New study asks if California's infrastructure can handle a forecasted surge in trade

SAN FRANCISCO - 04/20/04 - Busy and getting busier - that describes the airports, seaports, highways, and railways in California that move trade traffic through the state on its way to foreign destinations or other parts of the country, according to a study just released by the private, non-profit Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC).
?
One-fifth of US international trade currently passes through the Los Angeles and San Francisco International Airports and through the ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, and Port Hueneme.
?
Moreover, trade through the state is expected to increase significantly over the next 15 to 20 years - if California's infrastructure can accommodate the growth.

The report - California's Global Gateways: Trends and Issues - says the flow of two-way trade'through the state are expected to triple in weight by the year 2020. During the same period, the dollar value of exports shipped through California will increase by 148%, while the value of imports will increase by 81%.

The anticipated growth is not a certainty, however, it?concluded.?

In fact, the report said, it is unlikely to happen "unless more resources are devoted to expanding the state's trade infrastructure and managing its existing infrastructure more efficiently."
?
The forecasts?"are based on estimates of increased population, investment, gross domestic product, and other economic and demographic factors, not on what our ports and highways can effectively manage," said PPIC research fellow Jon Haveman, who co-authored the study with David Hummels, associate professor of economics at Purdue University. "Without more and better capacity, the state's infrastructure probably can't handle the growing demand - in effect, curbing growth," he said.
?
In fact, the study finds that capacity, particularly at the state's airports, has not kept pace with current demand and may already be deterring some shippers from using California's gateways: Between 1995 and 2002, the overall share of US trade handled by LAX and SFO International Airports dropped from 38% to 21%.
?
According to the study, about half of that decline is due to shippers choosing other US gateways to move their goods, and these preferences are partially due to congestion in and around California's airports.

Because most of the state's trade traffic neither originates in, nor is destined for California, the study asked the question: Is being an international distribution center for the nation worth the burden?

"Moving trade through the state creates jobs, business profits, and considerable tax revenue, but it also carries costs such as increased congestion, pollution, and wear and tear on infrastructure," said Haveman. "The challenge for policymakers is to weigh the pros and cons and decide whether California wants to make the investment to sustain itself as a major global gateway or to encourage international cargo to go elsewhere."

The analysis suggests a number of possible policy options to raise revenue for infrastructure investment, including increasing the state's share of federal funds and imposing user fees at or around major airports and seaports.

The study also considers recent and current issues that are affecting trade in the state and the nation - including the lingering consequences of the 2002 West Coast seaport shutdown. Although it is too soon to tell if the port closures will have long-term effects, in the months following the shutdown, the share of trade through the West Coast was lower than it had been in any of the previous five years.
?
Furthermore, imports from Asia - consistently between 77% and 78% of the nation's share from 1998 to 2001 - dropped significantly to 74% in the first six months of 2003.

"If problems like simple port congestion can idle an entire global production network, it's possible that a major shutdown like 2002's could have lasting effects," said Haveman.

Homeland security is also likely to affect California and the country's trade. The primary federal measure, the Container Security Initiative, requires cargo to be inspected at its foreign port and is anticipated to cause shipping delays and greater uncertainty about arrival times at US ports.
?
In contrast, initiatives such as the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), which encourages shippers and carriers to develop security plans for their cargo in transit, may have the opposite effect.
?
The report's analysis concludes that it is still unclear how these counteracting approaches will affect trade in California or the nation as a whole.

Go back, or read the latest Front Page stories:

US Seeks Stronger Ties With Brazil

WASHINGTON, DC – 06/13/06 – Rebounding from the failure to craft a Free Trade Area of the Americas pact, the Bush Administration is aiming at strengthening trade ties with Brazil in an effort to counter China’s fast-growing economic influence in Latin America; China should not only be seen as an export market with 1.3 billion consumers, but also as a nation of 1.3 billion ''new competitors,'' says US Secretary of Commerce Carlos Guittierez.


US Threatens WTO Action Against China

WASHINGTON, DC – 06/10/06 – The White House is threatening to slap China with a World Trade Organization case unless Beijing responds quickly to US concerns over its lack of action on securing intellectual property rights for US products; talks on bringing the WTO case are at a ''very advanced stage,'' according to a high level official in the Office of the US trade Representative.


High Hopes for Central American Trade Pact

WASHINGTON, DC – 06/08/06 – The US -Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) still faces some hurdles, but could become a reality ''very soon,'' according to Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick; the issues relating to government procurement, intellectual property rights and agriculture still need to be worked through, says the former US Trade Representative following a session of the Organization of American States (OAS) General Assembly in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.





 

 


Web Design & Development by Turn-It-Digital in Los Angeles