Port Cargo Backlog Raises Security Questions
Los Angeles, Long Beach terminals seeing severe congestion, labor shortages
LOS ANGELES - 07/29/04 - Severe cargo congestion and labor shortages at American seaports are creating long delays in delivering goods and potential threats to national security, dockworkers and security experts say, reports the New York Times (NYT).
The problems are particularly acute at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the nation'../eWebPhotos/polbsino1a.jpg" align=left vspace=15 border=0>cargo containers that arrive in the US each year.
David Arian, president of Local 13 of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), which works the Los Angeles waterfront, told NYT reporter John Broder that the facilities and work crews here could not keep up with the volume of incoming freight. Arian said that as a result some new port regulations from the Department of Homeland Security were not being followed.
"The specific regulations for checking seals to ensure integrity of containers and cargo in them are presently not being enforced," Arian said in a telephone conference call.
"In terms of checking people coming into the terminals, the only people they're checking are longshoremen. We've been down there 70 years, and we're the most secure part of the work force. The truckers they don't check at all," he said.
He said that terminal operators had begun to hire small numbers of additional workers to handle the freight backlog but that as many as 13,000 extra full- and part-time waterfront workers were needed at the two San Pedro Bay ports alone.
Jim McKenna, president of the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA), a trade organization representing ocean carriers and terminal operators serving West Coast seaports, sharply disputed Arian's contentions about enforcement.
"I can tell you unequivocally that all PMA members are in compliance with all the federal regulations," McKenna said.
He said that containers were sealed before they were loaded on ships bound for the US and that there was no opportunity for tampering with them before they arrived here. He also said that everyone entering a secure marine terminal must present identification or paperwork granting access.
"We are responsible for the ports," he said. "It's our cargoes, our customers, our workers. The flow of cargo would be disrupted beyond repair for us not to comply with security regulations."
According to the paper,'security and intelligence experts have identified the nation's 361 seaports and the 60,000 mostly foreign-flagged ships that sail in and out of them each year as prime targets for a potential terrorist attack. But ships and seaports have received only a small fraction of the attention given the aviation system since the?9/11 terrorist attacks, they said.
Stephen E. Flynn, a retired US Coast Guard commander and a maritime security expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, contends that cargo containers will one day be used as "the poor man's missile" to deliver devastating weapons to American shores.
"The question is when, not if," said Flynn, author of "America the Vulnerable: How Our Government Is Failing to Protect Us From Terrorism," published this month by HarperCollins.
He said American ports were ill equipped to handle the volume of freight passing through them daily, particularly compared with the sophisticated marine terminals in Singapore, Hong Kong and Rotterdam.
He also said overcrowding and outmoded transportation and cargo-handling systems made the American ports an easy target for theft and terrorism. "Inefficiency leads to insecurity," he said in a telephone interview.
Bush Administration officials said port security was a high priority and described what they called a multi-layered system intended to prevent a sea-borne attack by cargo ship.
During a visit to the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach last month, Tom Ridge, the homeland security secretary, said port security began even before ships bound for the US were loaded at foreign ports. He said that intelligence agencies tracked shipments and that federal law required every ship sailing for American shores to file a manifest of all cargo.
"We will now be better able to harden physical infrastructure, verify the security of individual vessels before they approach a US port, and better restrict access to our port areas," Ridge said.
James F. Michie, a spokesman for the US Customs and Border Protection Agency, which polices land crossings and ports, told the paper?it was impossible to inspect every container entering the country. But he said American ports were moving and screening containers at a rate consistent with the current threat alert level of yellow, for elevated.
Michie said that some containers were physically inspected and that others were scanned by radiation-detection devices and other high-technology tools.
"It is a system that is under development; we think it's the best we've got now, but it's going to get better," he said. "We think we're on the right track."
The problems are worsened by the surge in traffic in containerized freight. Ever larger ships - some with more than 7,000 cargo containers each - are docking at American ports, which are poorly equipped to move the freight.
The average container now sits on the dock for seven or eight days before being loaded onto a rail car or a truck chassis for transport to the interior of the country, said Blair Garcia, a strategic planner at the TranSystems Corporation, which analyzes and designs transportation facilities nationwide.
Garcia said port congestion and freight backlogs had national security considerations beyond the possibility of terrorists' using ships or cargo containers as weapons delivery systems.
He said the Pentagon had a new requirement that commercial shippers and ports be able to load and move the equipment for five Army divisions in 75 days, with a goal of reducing that to 30 days.
By contrast, in the Persian Gulf war of 1991, the military moved six divisions in 180 days.
"You can imagine what kind of stress that puts on our commercial assets and infrastructure as we're also trying to move commercial goods," Garcia said.
back, or read the latest Front Page stories:
US, EU Sign Landmark Wine Agreement
WASHINGTON, DC – 11/27/05 – California wine producers are set to take advantage of a new agreement between the US and the European Union assuring that there will be no disruption in the transatlantic wine trade before a broader wine agreement reached in September takes effect; exports of US wines have grown dramatically in the past 10 years, with the European Union - led by the United Kingdom - accounting for a full 66% of total US overseas wine sales in 2004.
Bye, Bye Byrdie?
WASHINGTON, DC – 11/22/05 – The House of Representatives has passed a repeal of the controversial Byrd Amendment that authorizes payment of anti-dumping duties revenue to US companies that have petitioned the government to investigate imports allegedly dumped on the US market; the Byrd Amendment was ruled illegal by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2003, but its repeal remains uncertain as the current version of the current Senate bill contains no such provision.
Time is Running Out, But Hope Springs Eternal
WASHINGTON, DC – 11/18/05 – With less than four weeks left before the start of the scheduled WTO ministerial in Hong Kong, the US is still ''hopeful'' that the planned global trade meeting will succeed in improving the lot of the world's devloping economies; but, USTR Rob Portman slams the European Union for blocking a successful conclusion to the sputtering agricultural subsidy negotiations that have threatened to derail the upcoming ministerial.