San Francisco's ''Missed Air Cargo Connection''
Questions raised on SFO's ability to handle increased freight volume
SAN FRANCISCO - 08/04/04 - The Bay Area economy "is acutely reliant on the region's airports, and no airfield is more critical to the region's economic fortunes than San Francisco International Airport, especially when it comes to international Business," according to international trade consultant Jock O'Connell.
"More than 90 percent of the international travelers arriving or departing the Bay Area use SFO. But what is less generally known is that SFO - and not the sprawling maritime shipping complex at the Port of Oakland - is Northern California's principal conduit for international trade," writes O'Connell in the August 3 edition of the San Francisco Chronicle.
In fact, "as federal Department of Transportation figures bear out, SFO handles more than double the two-way trade measured by dollar value) moving across the docks" at the Port of Oakland.
"Whether SFO will be able to provide the global air-freight connections that Bay Area businesses will require in the years ahead is an open question, however," he said, citing a report issued in April by the San Francisco-based Public Policy Institute of California that "offers compelling evidence that SFO's competitiveness as international air cargo hub has been waning since at least the mid-1990s."
A similar conclusion, "was reached in a January 2003 study for the Pacific Council on International Policy, which specifically noted that cargo-handling inefficiencies at SFO were forcing more and more freight forwarders to route overseas shipments through airports in Southern California."
According to the Sacramento-based O'Connell, "The issue here goes well beyond whether the international air transport needs of local companies are being adequately met. Ultimately, what's at stake is the Bay Area's ability to remain economically competitive and to retain its stature as a commercial crossroads."
In the global economy of the 21st century, he said, "world-class seaport and airport facilities confer substantial economic advantages by reducing transportation costs and more generally facilitating links between local businesses and the global economy," adding "regions so endowed have a sizable edge in pursuing economic development strategies that target highly competitive companies and the well-paying jobs they typically provide."
O'Connell cited a 2001 report by the Bay Area Economic Forum report that observed: "While air transportation is vital to the movement of trade nationally, this is emphatically the case in the San Francisco Bay Area due to the region's technology economy and the high value of its technology exports."
Regrettably, he said, "SFO has been unconscionably slow to upgrade its facilities in anticipation of huge increases in the volume of international and, more specifically, transpacific air cargo trade. The consequences are becoming easier to identify."
For example, "California's merchandise exports surged by 19.9% through the first five months of this year, but the volume of international cargo handled by SFO inched upward by only 1.3%, according to the Federal Aviation Administration and carriers that serve SFO."
In June, the San Francisco Airport Commission spurned a proposal from Airis Holdings, LLC, a Texas-based private developer, for a huge 633,000 square-foot, privately financed, state-of-the-art air cargo terminal.
"Instead, the airport has chosen to bolster SFO's cargo-handling capacity on its own," said O'Connell.
"How the only California airport assigned a negative credit outlook by Standard & Poors intends to pay for a vast new construction project is anyone's guess," he said. "SFO is still paying off about $4 billion in debt from previous capital projects, and its principal tenant, United Airlines, is in bankruptcy."
The airport's plan," said O'Connell, "involves a piecemeal approach, building the cargo terminal over several years and thus assuring maximum feasible disruption of the airport's air cargo operations. Even worse, the plan caters largely to the handling requirements of a handful of major domestic carriers who transport freight primarily in the bellies of passenger jets."
Meanwhile, "the air cargo operations of large foreign carriers like EVA, Air China and Korean Air, who make far greater use of dedicated air-freighters, have been exiled to an off- airport gulag of widely dispersed warehouses that are miles of congested streets and highways away from SFO," he said.
According to O'Connell, "Even if heightened security concerns do not eventually lead to a general ban on transporting freight aboard passenger planes, there is little question that the real heavy lifting on transpacific routes will be done by Asian carriers, especially those operating all-cargo services."
"Yet," he adds, "without the highly mechanized and technologically sophisticated type of facility foreign carriers are demanding, SFO will likely see more and more international air cargo diverted elsewhere. That, in turn, is apt to further tarnish the Bay Area's reputation as a place for globally engaged companies to do business."
SFO "is truly a regional asset, but its operations reflect the often distinctive interests of its sole proprietor, the City and County of San Francisco. As a mecca for tourists and conventioneers, San Francisco has an understandably keen interest in facilitating passengers," he said.
?"That priority has long served to inform, if not dominate, SFO's expansion plans."
It is, said O'Connell, "unfortunately, a governance structure that poorly serves the more industrialized counties such as Santa Clara, Alameda and Contra Costa that generate most of the Bay Area's air cargo."?
back, or read the latest Front Page stories:
US Seeks Stronger Ties With Brazil
WASHINGTON, DC – 06/13/06 – Rebounding from the failure to craft a Free Trade Area of the Americas pact, the Bush Administration is aiming at strengthening trade ties with Brazil in an effort to counter China’s fast-growing economic influence in Latin America; China should not only be seen as an export market with 1.3 billion consumers, but also as a nation of 1.3 billion ''new competitors,'' says US Secretary of Commerce Carlos Guittierez.
US Threatens WTO Action Against China
WASHINGTON, DC – 06/10/06 – The White House is threatening to slap China with a World Trade Organization case unless Beijing responds quickly to US concerns over its lack of action on securing intellectual property rights for US products; talks on bringing the WTO case are at a ''very advanced stage,'' according to a high level official in the Office of the US trade Representative.
High Hopes for Central American Trade Pact
WASHINGTON, DC – 06/08/06 – The US -Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) still faces some hurdles, but could become a reality ''very soon,'' according to Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick; the issues relating to government procurement, intellectual property rights and agriculture still need to be worked through, says the former US Trade Representative following a session of the Organization of American States (OAS) General Assembly in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.