
WTO ''Strongly Urged'' to End Certain Subsidies
New rules would expand the existing category of subsidies by five
WASHINGTON, DC – 06/04/07 – The Bush Administration is "strongly urging" the World Trade Organization (WTO) to prohibit what it calls “certain particularly trade-distorting subsidies” in a variety of industries, except agriculture.
"It's time to take the next step in the development of stronger WTO rules that will rein in the use of industrial subsidies," said US Trade Representative Susan Schwab, adding that "the subsidies we want to prohibit maintain inefficient production capacity in industries ranging from steel to semiconductors."
Stronger rules for these types of subsidies, she said, ''would address significant trade-distorting practices of many of our trading partners that often lead to unfair trade. In an increasingly global economy, foreign government subsidies provide a distinctly unfair competitive advantage''
The official paper – submitted to the WTO Negotiating Group on Rules at the WTO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland – also proposes additional WTO transparency procedures applicable to state-owned companies and government subsidies to them, but, however, does not apply to the global agricultural sector.
The US paper urges the WTO to adopt rules prohibiting five types of subsidies if they are ''specific'' (or, only given to a particular company or industry) and benefit a product that is exported or competes with imports – the coverage of operating losses; the forgiveness of government-held debt; the lending to ''uncreditworthy'' companies; equity investments in ''unequityworthy'' companies; and other financing, such as “royalty-based” financing, that is not commercially available.
Currently, the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures only prohibits two types of subsidies, namely export and import substitution subsidies.
The US proposal would also expand the existing category by adding five additional types of particularly trade-distorting subsidies.
Under the current rules on prohibited subsidies, a WTO member country can request a WTO dispute settlement panel to examine an alleged prohibited subsidy. If the panel finds that a prohibited subsidy is being provided, the subsidy must be withdrawn ''without delay.''
Last month, the US had filed a complaint at WTO against India saying its duties on beer, wine, and selected other imports are in violation of global trade rules.
Go
back, or read the latest Front Page stories:
California Exports Take a Nosedive

SACRAMENTO 03/17/09 A virtual mirror of the global economic slowdown, California saw its merchandise export trade crash-dive by more than 20% in January, according to the University of California Center; the states overseas sales of non-manufactured goods dropped by almost 29% during the same period.

COMMENTARY: Wither California?

LOS ANGELES 03/04/09 Once lauded as the countrys center for trade and entrepreneurism, California is in ''desperate straits'' and is on a slow descent into mediocrity as politicians and bureaucrats in Sacramento continue to alienate and exasperate the states international business community; the state, analysts and observers say, is being done-in by a steady diet of two decades of chronic overspending, over-regulating and a hyper-progressive tax code.

Is a Trade War on the Horizon?

WASHINGTON, DC 02/16/09 In a major development with a potentially catastrophic impact, the US Congress has passed a controversial $787 billion ''stimulus'' package that includes ''Buy American'' provisions that are raising fears among the countrys trading partners that a dangerous shift toward protectionism is on the rise in Washington; Canada, Japan, China, and the European Union have all voiced serious concerns over the move saying that the perceived shift in Washington could upset an already fragile international trade mechanism and further damage the worlds struggling economies.

|