
L.A., L.B. Ports Approve New Infrastructure Fee
Funds generated are expected to raise $1.4 billion for rail, road improvement projects
LOS ANGELES – 01/15/08 – The harbor commissions of both the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach have jointly approved a new “infrastructure cargo fee” (ICF) aimed at generating $1.4 billion for a host of transportation projects “to improve traffic flow and air quality in the harbor area.”
Beginning January 1, 2009, the new fee will be assessed on every loaded 20-foot equivalent (TEU) cargo container entering or leaving any terminal at either port by truck or train.
The amount of the fee “will fluctuate based on the current funding needs of approved projects.”
According to the original fee proposal, the ports “have explored all available federal, state and local sources of funding for infrastructure projects. Although such funds are available and the ports have been successful in obtaining funding from all these sources for these infrastructure projects, these funds are insufficient.
Federal and state sources, it said, “typically require local matching funds and public-private partnerships,” which “neccessitates the ICF to supplement other sources of funds and to serve as the local match for these funds.”
It is anticipated “that the charge would be $15 per loaded TEU for seven years, but could vary depending on how quickly the ports move forward with their projects,” the ports said.
The new ICF is being levied on loaded containers only “because empty container moves are ancillary to loaded container moves: repositioning containers for the next load.”
In addition, “it is extremely difficult to attribute empty container moves to cargo owners and consumers, the ultimate beneficiaries of cargo movement,” the ports said.
The fee will be collected against the cargo in an amount appropriate for the primary move and all related use of the infrastructure projects, and will only be imposed once on each loaded container.
Some containers, the ports said, “move between terminals within the ports because the first terminal does not have on-dock rail or because each terminal does not have enough cargo to make up a train for a particular destination without supplementation from other terminals.
Under the ICF, the first terminal to handle such a container will assess the fee and the movement of the container to another terminal will be exempt from the fee.
Funds produced by the new fee, which applies to the entire San Pedro Bay region, will also be used to match Proposition 1B funds, which California voters approved in 2006 to help pay for major transportation and air quality improvement projects.
Combined, the cargo fee and Proposition 1B funds will finance about $3 billion in improvements at both ports and only be used for approved local projects, while spending will be limited to specific projects after project approval by the applicable lead agency and fee collection would stop when those projects are completed.
All of the proposed improvement projects are included in the statewide California Goods Movement Action Plan.
As proposed, cargo fee revenue and Proposition 1B funds will fund both rail and highway projects including improvement of the ports’ rail network and local highway improvements including the replacement of the aging Gerald Desmond Bridge, which links Long Beach and Terminal Island, and the construction of an interchange to allow the removal of a traffic light at Navy Way and Seaside Avenue.
The ICF will also fund projects to improve access from the Harbor Freeway to the Port of Los Angeles and upgrade the Terminal Island Freeway by replacing the Schuyler Heim drawbridge and constructing a four-lane, elevated expressway between Ocean Boulevard and Alameda Street at Pacific Coast Highway.
The decision to impose the new ICF follows on the heels of a cargo fee of $35 per loaded TEU enacted last month to help generate $1.6 billion to help fund the ports’ Clean Trucks Program aimed at replacing and retrofitting older, diesel-powered trucks.
Go
back, or read the latest Front Page stories:
Obama Should Complete Doha Round, CEOs Say

NEW YORK – 11/20/08 – A number of senior level corporate executives are urging the incoming Obama Administration to complete the long-stalled Doha Round of international trade talks in a new report published by the Wall Street Journal; responding to the report, New York Democrat Sen. Charles Schumer said that the Obama Administration and ''Democrats in general think we should trade in the global world,'' but concerns about ''income inequality'' should make business and government ''work together to cushion the blow.''

LA, LB Ports Delay Collection of Clean Truck Fees

LONG BEACH – 11/15/08 – The controversial Clean Truck Program at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach has run into a snag as the collection of the fees generated by the program has been delayed until discussions between the Federal Maritime Commission and West Coast marine terminal operators over ''procedural issues'' are completed; in October, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a “friend of the court” brief in support of a challenge by the American Trucking Association (ATA) to the Concession Plan provision of the program.

No Trade, Free Trade, Fair Trade: The World Opines

LOS ANGELES – 11/05/08 – While US trade policy hovered as a decidedly back-burner issue during the recently concluded presidential campaign, the importance of the country’s trade relations with the world and the possibility of an Obama Administration following through on its protectionist campaign rhetoric is taking center stage with newspapers and other news media outlets from Manila to Berlin; the following excerpts from media sources around the world cover the gamut from cautious optimism to predictions of retaliation against US exports by US trade partners.

|